Do Another California Case Law Search
Cases Citing This Case
Long v. Cuttle Construction Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 834 , 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 698
Jan 8, 1998.]
MICHAEL LONG et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CUTTLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.
(Opinion by Blease, J., with Puglia, P. J., and Scotland, J., concurring.)
Porter, Scott, Weiberg & Delehant, Craig A. Caldwell, Vanessa W. Whang and Carissa A. Shubb for Defendant and Appellant.
Vincent P. Beirne for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
This is an appeal from an order after judgment denying the motion of defendant judgment debtor Cuttle Construction Company (Cuttle) for an order to enter a satisfaction of judgment.
[60 Cal.App.4th 836]
Cuttle sent checks to plaintiffs' counsel to defray the judgment
debt. They were deposited in counsel's bank but the bank placed a
five-day hold on their payment.
The trial court denied the motion on the ground the interest
continued to run on the judgment during the period of the five-day
hold. Cuttle contends the trial court erred because interest ceased to accrue on the day that the checks were delivered.
The contention has merit and we will direct the entry of a satisfaction of the judgment.
Facts and Procedural Background
After an unsuccessful appeal of the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Michael and Sandra Long, Cuttle
sent checks, aggregating $1,859,564.10, to the Longs' attorney. He
received the checks on October 17, 1995. He deposited them at his bank
in his client trust account. The bank informed him that because of the
size of the checks there would be a five-day hold placed on them.
Thereafter, Cuttle demanded, pursuant to Code
of Civil Procedure section 724.050, that the Longs acknowledge
satisfaction of the judgment. They did not comply with the demand. Cuttle moved for an order directing the clerk to enter satisfaction of the judgment.
The Longs opposed the motion on the ground that under California
Uniform Commercial Code section 3310 the judgment debt was not paid
until the checks were cleared for payment by the bank and that interest
on the judgment continued to accrue until that time. They reasoned that
the judgment was not satisfied until the interim interest, amounting to
$5,661.79, was paid.
The trial court denied the motion for the reasons tendered by the Longs.
[1a] Cuttle contends the trial court erred in
concluding that interest continued to run on the judgment after the
date the checks were delivered to the Longs.
Cuttle submits that the matter is governed by Califonia Uniform Commercial Code section 3310 (hereafter section 3310, fn. 2, post). Cuttle argues
[60 Cal.App.4th 837]
that under section 3310, once the check is honored, the underlying
obligation should be considered discharged as of the time the check was
received by the creditor.
The Longs agree that section 3310 applies; however, they argue
that interest continues to accrue until the judgment debt is
discharged, i.e., during the period that the obligation is suspended
pending payment of the check.
Cuttle has the more persuasive position.
Numerous interrelated statutes bear on the question. "Interest
accrues at the rate of 10 percent per annum on the principal amount of
a money judgment remaining unsatisfied." (Code Civ. Proc., § 685.010.)
"If a money judgment is satisfied in full other than pursuant to a writ
under this title, interest ceases to accrue on the date the judgment is
satisfied in full." (Code Civ. Proc., § 685.030, subd. (b).) "A money
judgment may be satisfied by payment of the full amount required to
satisfy the judgment ...." (Code Civ. Proc., § 724.010, subd. (a).) The
question is: When does "payment" occur in a transaction where the
creditor accepts a check?
"Performance of an obligation for the delivery of money only, is called
payment." (Civ. Code, § 1478.) Payment to a judgment creditor is
governed by the cases and statutes which govern commercial
transactions. (See Noyes v. Habitation Resources, Inc. (1975)
49 Cal.App.3d 910
, 913 [123 Cal.Rptr. 261, 82 A.L.R.3d 1192].) Like a contract creditor,
a judgment creditor may demand payment in cash. (Ibid.) If there is no
objection to the form of tender, and the judgment creditor accepts a
check, the determination of the time of payment is governed by the
rules pertaining to commercial transactions generally. (See Ibid.)
It has long been the rule as to such
transactions that "... once the check is paid, the payment of the
underlying debt which was theretofore conditional becomes absolute and
relates back to the date of the delivery of the check [Citations]."
(Navrides v. Zurich Ins. Co. (1971)
5 Cal.3d 698
, 706 [97 Cal.Rptr. 309, 488 P.2d 637, 49 A.L.R.3d 828].)
[60 Cal.App.4th 838]
 The Longs argue that this rule is precluded by section 3310.
They submit that it is inconsistent with the provision that the
effect of the check is only to suspend the underlying obligation, not
to discharge it. We disagree. The rule regarding the suspension of an
obligation does not pertain to the interim accrual of interest. Its
purpose is to allow the creditor the option, on dishonor of the
instrument, to sue either on the instrument or the underlying
obligation. (See 2 West's U. Laws Ann. (1991) U.C.C. (rev. art. 3) §
3-310, Official Com., subd. 3, p. 84.)
[1b] Contrary to the Longs' claim, the rule of relation back of
payment is supported by the text of section 3310. Subdivision (b)(1)
provides that if an uncertified check is taken for the obligation, the
obligation is suspended "to the [same] extent" as if payment were made
in money. Under the statutes related above, if payment were made in
money, interest would cease to accrue. Under section 3310, subsequent
payment of the check results in discharge of the obligation. No
interest accrues during the suspension of the obligation, which extends
until the point of discharge. Hence, no further interest is due and the
discharge relates back to the time of acceptance of the check. (Also
see generally, Civ. Code, § 1504, an offer of payment stops the running
The order denying Cuttle's motion is reversed; the trial court is directed to order the court clerk to enter satisfaction of the judgment. Cuttle shall recover its costs of this appeal.
Puglia, P. J., and Scotland, J., concurred.
Respondents' petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied April 15, 1998.
The time of payment need not be the same as the time the judgment
creditor is obliged to give an acknowledgment of the satisfaction of
judgment. "Where a money judgment is satisfied by payment to the
judgment creditor by check or other form of noncash payment that is to
be honored upon presentation by the judgment creditor for payment, the
obligation of the judgment creditor to give or file an acknowledgment
of satisfaction of judgment arises only when the check or other form of
noncash payment has actually been honored upon presentation for
payment." (Code Civ. Proc., § 724.010, subd. (c).)
Section 3310, in pertinent part, is as follows.
"(a) Unless otherwise agreed, if a certified check, cashier's
check, or teller's check is taken for an obligation, the obligation is
discharged to the same extent discharge would result if an amount of
money equal to the amount of the instrument were taken in payment of
the obligation. Discharge of the obligation does not affect any
liability that the obligor may have as an indorser of the instrument.
"(b) Unless otherwise agreed and except as provided in
subdivision (a), if a note or an uncertified check is taken for an
obligation, the obligation is suspended to the same extent the
obligation would be discharged if an amount of money equal to the
amount of the instrument were taken, and the following rules apply:
"(1) In the case of an uncertified check, suspension of the
obligation continues until dishonor of the check or until it is paid or
certified. Payment or certification of the check results in discharge
of the obligation to the extent of the amount of the check."
Do Another California Case Law Search
Copyright © 1993-2005 AccessLaw
Find a Lawyer:
Our free service locates Bankruptcy, Criminal, DUI, Immigration,
Personal Injury, Taxation, or Trademark lawyers in your area who can
help you with your legal issues. From LawQuote.com
U.S. Legal Forms, Inc.:
**Over 32,000 Legal Forms** Stop Reinventing the Wheel each time you
draft a legal document. Save Time and Money! Visit USlegalforms.com
PCLaw & PCLawPro:
ONE integrated system to manage your whole office. Provides time
billing, accounting and practice management. Download a FREE demo.
Online Paralegal Services: Proxilaw takes care of your document preparation and filing chores. Incorporation, living trusts, LLCs, divorce & more.
Enter data once, use everywhere! Integrated calendar, cases, contacts,
conflicts, time/billing, accounting. Full front/back office.
WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW: Connect with technology and programs that help you learn more effectively.
Amicus Attorney: Easy-to-use and intuitive - experience great practice management software that works the way you do. Free Trial.
Tabs3 and PracticeMaster: Reliable billing and practice management software for solo to mid-sized firms. Recommended by 94% of firms that use them.
LawQuote: Need an attorney? Our free service connects you to a nationwide network of lawyers who can help you with your case.
Westlaw: cases and statutes--$12